Civil Procedure: Judgments: Effect of Prior "Compromise" Judgment as Collateral Estoppel
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
transferor effect of appeal from civil judgment
abstracttransferor effect of appeal from civil judgment move case in the opinion of court of appeal/investigation of this court does not merely from forms and procedure perspective but investigation comprise the whole of the case.at contemporary world the role of appeal courts fundamentally changed and the process of investigation in the appeal court violated principle of double degree of proce...
متن کاملeffective enforcement of civil judgments
right of enforcement developed to the right of effective enforcement which both rooted in judicial protection. effective enforcement needs to foresee clear and useful, expeditious and cheap methods that helps the collection of defendant’s financial information and facilitates voluntary enforcement of judgment and finally use of professional and independent persons in execution process. in irani...
متن کاملClinical Judgment Scripts as a Strategy to Foster Clinical Judgments.
BACKGROUND Clinical judgment encompasses how nurses use their knowledge of the patient to generate, assess, and prioritize patient care alternatives. Previous research has identified debriefing as critical to developing clinical judgment. Best practice for debriefing has yet to be identified. The purpose of this research was to investigate whether a standard debriefing script, based on Tanner's...
متن کاملCounterfactuals as Self-generated Primes: the Effect of Prior Counterfactual Activation on Person Perception Judgments
Three experiments tested whether counterfactual events can serve as primes. The evidence supports the hypothesis that counterfactuals prime a mental simulation mind-set that leads people to consider alternatives. Exposure to counterfactual sce narios affected person perception judgments in a later, unrelated task and this effect was distinct from semantic construct priming. Moreover, these effe...
متن کاملThe effect of testing procedure on remember-know judgments.
Remember-know (R-K) judgments are commonly used to assess conscious recollection of the study episode during recognition. We varied whether participants judged items as R, K, or new (one-step) or first made an old-new judgment and then made the R-K judgment (two-step). The one-step group had a higher R hit rate and K false alarm rate than did the two-step group. In addition, the K responses of ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Michigan Law Review
سال: 1957
ISSN: 0026-2234
DOI: 10.2307/1285906